Definition: Statute of Frauds
The Statute of Frauds is a state law that requires certain types of contracts to be in writing in order to be legally enforceable. This includes contracts related to the sale of land, mortgages, and various real estate agreements. The primary purpose of the statute is to prevent fraudulent claims and misunderstandings that can arise with oral agreements. The Statute of Frauds also serves to preserve the integrity of significant transactions by ensuring there is a clear, written record of the agreement.
For real estate specifically, the Statute of Frauds applies to:
- Deeds
- Mortgages
- Contracts for sale or purchase of land
- Assignments of contracts
- Agreements that do not conform to lease terms longer than one year
Example: An oral agreement for the sale of land is unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds. If two parties agree verbally to the sale of a property but do not put the agreement in writing, the contract is not legally binding and cannot be enforced in a court of law.
Examples
- Sale of Land: If Anna verbally agrees to sell her property to Bob, but there is no written contract or deed, the agreement cannot legally enforce the sale.
- Mortgage Agreements: If a lender provides a mortgage to a borrower based on an oral agreement, without any written document, the borrower is not legally bound to the terms of the loan.
- Long-Term Leases: Bruce agrees orally to lease a commercial property to Claire for five years. Since the lease agreement is for a period longer than one year and is not in writing, it is unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of the Statute of Frauds?
The purpose of the Statute of Frauds is to prevent fraudulent claims and disputes over certain types of transactions by requiring a written agreement that is signed by the parties involved.
Are there any exceptions to the Statute of Frauds in real estate?
Yes, one notable exception is lease agreements for periods shorter than one year, which do not have to be in writing to be enforceable.
What happens if a contract that should be subject to the Statute of Frauds is not in writing?
Such a contract is considered unenforceable. This means that if one party fails to honor the agreement, the other party cannot seek legal enforcement of the terms.
Can emails or electronic agreements fulfill the Statute of Frauds requirement?
In many jurisdictions, electronic communications, including emails that clearly detail the essential terms and include signatures (electronic or digital), can meet the requirements of the Statute of Frauds.
Does the Statute of Frauds apply to amendments to existing contracts?
Yes, any amendment to a contract that falls under the Statute of Frauds must also be in writing to be enforceable.
Related Terms
Deed
A legal document that represents the ownership of property. A deed must be in writing and conform to certain formalities to be enforceable.
Mortgage
A legal agreement in which a lender provides funds to a borrower to purchase property, with the property itself serving as collateral for the loan.
Lease Agreement
A contract between a lessor and lessee where the lessee gains temporary possession of a property in exchange for periodic payments. For terms longer than one year, the lease agreement must be in writing.
Real Estate Contract
A legally binding agreement between parties involved in buying, selling, or leasing property. Such contracts must be in writing if they fall under the purview of the Statute of Frauds.
Online Resources
- Legal Information Institute (LII) - Statute of Frauds
- Nolo - Understanding Contracts
- American Bar Association (ABA) - Guide to Real Estate Law
References
- “Black’s Law Dictionary” by Bryan A. Garner
- “Real Estate Law (Real Estate Law (Washington))” by Marianne M. Jennings
- “The Essential Guide to Housing and Property Law” by David Listokin and David T. Listokin
Suggested Books for Further Studies
- “Real Estate Law” by Marianne M. Jennings
- “Property Law: Rules, Policies, and Practices” by Joseph W. Singer
- “Understanding Property Law” by John G. Sprankling